![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgduTYIlnLt3hvVnnWiNyWmvh2Due3PlaUArXgqdro0urzAWiHFfXAA4F8NytCxZzqbGXynT3mbJT31a3xv2nWJFsA6MRQ3vvVABJ68jF2AHUlbz57CbQfcIQdjFA_Ca66sWoW0/s320/logo_Commvault.png)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCv4uUuL7gc41N2BxQERN-aX6LEP0ZTUbaVVhtNuUinEX9se1p-DonYAqpd1ykz7OCmL3KSWjQBIzTjIkvK27H70r8Sx3Up7fH0eCh8GzZ6NLSQDNRmog0m6e3wZ025IOiyMfR/s200/logo_Hedvigv2.png)
On the other hand, Hedvig had difficulties to really confirm its technology leadership with real market penetration suffering from long sales cycle, new comers, open source and lack of visibility. It turns out that the final decision was to find an exit and Commvault seems to be a good combination.
We're still surprised that HPE didn't jump into that deal as Hedvig had investment from HPE and board presence and the company belongs to the HPE Pathfinder investment body. The other motivation is that storage software is so weak at HPE that we still wonder why it didn't work especially as the transaction was pretty small, just $225M, a real bargain representing just a 4.3 multiple and confirming Hedvig's struggle period.
0 commentaires:
Post a Comment