The second point is related to the term used. This announce confirms the role of tape but I'm surprised to read Storage- instead of Tape-as-a-Service. Probably because OVHcloud is not at all a storage specialist but more a hosting company and continues to confuse the market. With ransomware being a dominant threat, tape and air gap make really sense.
Tape continues to evolve even if last LTO-9 characteristics have disappointed the market but recent Fujifilm and IBM research prove some new optimism for large tape capacity with prototype of 580TB per cartridge.
It is true that tape has a very low TCO as a passive media but users have to consider as well time to access data, also known as Recovery Time Objective aka RTO, and drives ratio versus tapes number to avoid long waiting time as tape drives are the critical resources. But when you compare include tape library and tape drive and not only tape, add also redundancy factor and compare with disk array as a whole with energy dimension over 5 or 10 years. On the other hand it would be crazy to keep online 10 years an archive disk array without any energy control mechanism. Tape has morphed into archive even deep archive media of choice and coupled with a catalog or content index make adoption simpler.
This is interesting as Scaleway, an other French cloud provider, promotes a disk-based deep archive system without any tape. This service spin down and stop drives to align energy savings with tape. Good, the battle continues... And we wait archive on flash as footprint is fantastic, restart is super fast, we just wait cost to go down.
0 commentaires:
Post a Comment